作者 | 张勃萱 |
姓名汉语拼音 | ZhangBoxuan |
学号 | 20200000006013 |
培养单位 | 兰州财经大学 |
电话 | 13709198290 |
电子邮件 | 609865627@qq.com |
入学年份 | 2020-9 |
学位类别 | 学术硕士 |
培养级别 | 硕士研究生 |
学科门类 | 法学 |
一级学科名称 | 经济法学 |
学科方向 | 经济法学 |
学科代码 | 030107 |
授予学位 | 法学硕士 |
第一导师姓名 | 张革新 |
第一导师姓名汉语拼音 | ZhangGexin |
第一导师单位 | 兰州财经大学 |
第一导师职称 | 教授 |
题名 | 平台经济领域价格歧视的反垄断规制研究 |
英文题名 | Research on Anti monopoly Regulation of Price Discrimination in Platform Economy |
关键词 | 平台经济 价格歧视 反垄断法 个人信息保护 |
外文关键词 | Platform economy;Price discrimination;Determination of illegality;Personal information protection |
摘要 | 价格歧视一直以来都是反垄断领域的重点研究对象,而平台经济作为数字经济时代背景下新的经济模式正在迅速发展,如何有效规制平台经济领域中的价格歧视行为成为了重要的研究课题。在经济学的研究领域中,价格歧视行为被认为是经营者在参与市场竞争的过程中采取的价格策略。在一定程度上,价格歧视行为能够起到促进市场竞争、提高经济效率的作用。但与之相对的,经营者对产品采取差异化定价的最终目的是为了从消费者身上获得更多的剩余价值,这不仅会损害消费者的利益,同时也会破坏整体市场正常的竞争环境。虽然我国反垄断法对价格歧视行为做出了相应的规定,但由于平台经济属于新兴产物,其特殊性、对现行反垄断规则的解释等因素都可能制约法律监管的效果。因此,有必要对平台经济领域的价格歧视行为进行研究和优化。本文通过对国内外价格歧视方面的文献资料进行收集、归纳、研究,并结合我国的平台经济发展现状,以期能够为我国平台经济领域价格歧视行为的反垄断规制提出完善建议。 全文由以下五部分组成:第一部分主要阐述了本文研究背景,国内外研究现状,研究思路和方法,创新和不足。第二部分详细介绍了平台经济及价格歧视的相关概念及特征。同时围绕平台经济的发展现状、在特殊领域内价格歧视行为的特殊性作出进一步论述,重点分析了规制平台经济领域价格歧视行为的必要性。第三部分剖析了平台经济领域价格歧视行为的反垄断规制现状及存在问题。主要包括传统价格歧视的反垄断规制规定以及平台经济领域价格歧视认定原则,分析平台经济领域认定价格歧视的困境。第四部分对国外平台经济领域价格歧视的立法现状进行概述,并对国外符合我国国情的相关制度经验进行借鉴。主要包括欧盟《通用数据保护条例》以及日本《关于数字平台与提供个人信息的消费者进行交易过程中滥用市场优势地位的指南》、美国《罗宾逊—帕特曼法》。第五部分是平台经济领域价格歧视行为的反垄断规制建议。结合国内对于价格歧视行为的反垄断规制研究,在我国现有法律制度的基础上,对于我国当前平台经济领域价格歧视的反垄断规制中存在的问题,提出具有针对性的建议。 |
英文摘要 | Price discrimination has always been an important research object in the field of antimonopoly. As a new economic model under the background of the digital economy era, platform economy is significantly different from traditional industries. With the rapid development of platform economy, how to effectively regulate price discrimination in the field of platform economy has become an important issue.In the research field of economics, price discrimination is a price strategy adopted by enterprises to participate in market competition. To some extent, price discrimination can promote market competition and improve economic efficiency. However, the ultimate purpose of operators' differentiated pricing of products is to obtain more surplus value from consumers, which will damage the interests of consumers and the normal competitive environment of the overall market.Although China's antimonopoly law has made corresponding provisions on price discrimination, because platform economy is an emerging product, interpretation of existing antimonopoly rules and other factors may restrict the effect of legal supervision. Therefore, it is necessary to study and optimize price discrimination in the field of platform economy. This paper collects, summarizes and studies the literature on price discrim ination at home and abroad, and combines the development status of China's platform economy, with a view to putting forward suggestions for improving the antimonopoly regulation of price discrimination in China's platform economy. The full text consists of the following five parts: the first part mainly introduces the research situation background, research significance and status at home and abroad, research ideas and methods. The second part introduces the related concepts and characteristics of platform economy and price discrim ination in detail. At the same time. The third part analyzes the current situation and existing problems of antimonopoly regulation of price discrimination in the field of platform economy. It mainly includes the antimonopoly regulations of traditional price discrimination and the principle of price discrimination identification in the platform economy field, and analyzes the dilemma of price discrimination identification in the platform economy field. The fourth part summarizes the legislative status quo of price discrimination in the field of platform economy in foreign countries, and draws lessons from the relevant institutional experiences in foreign countries that are in line with China's national conditions.It mainly includes the General Data Protection Regulation, the Japanese Guidelines on the Abuse of Market Advantage Position in Transactions between Digital Platforms and Consumers Providing Personal Information, and the American Robinson Patman Act. The fifth part is the suggestions on antimonopoly regulation of price discrimination in the field of platform economy. Combined withthe domestic research on antimonopoly regulation of price discrimination, on the basis of our existing legal system, this paper puts forward targeted suggestions for the problems in antimonopoly regulation of price discrimination in the current platform economy field. |
学位类型 | 硕士 |
答辩日期 | 2023-05-23 |
学位授予地点 | 甘肃省兰州市 |
研究方向 | 市场规制法 |
语种 | 中文 |
论文总页数 | 55 |
参考文献总数 | 72 |
馆藏号 | 0004899 |
保密级别 | 公开 |
中图分类号 | DF4/188 |
文献类型 | 学位论文 |
条目标识符 | http://ir.lzufe.edu.cn/handle/39EH0E1M/33709 |
专题 | 法学院 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 张勃萱. 平台经济领域价格歧视的反垄断规制研究[D]. 甘肃省兰州市. 兰州财经大学,2023. |
条目包含的文件 | 下载所有文件 | |||||
文件名称/大小 | 文献类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
10741_2020000006013_(839KB) | 学位论文 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 下载 |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[张勃萱]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[张勃萱]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[张勃萱]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论