法学院知识库

随着数字技术的飞速发展，数字内容平台凭借网络效应、用户锁定效应和版权集中效应所产生的竞争优势，构建起对现有和潜在竞争者进入市场的强大壁垒。数字内容平台通过建立其他平台难以逾越的版权壁垒，突破权利边界实施的版权滥用行为损害了数字版权市场的竞争，进而触发反垄断法的规制。现行的事中事后为主的反垄断执法方式，面对数字内容平台领域中的反垄断问题时，其效力显得相对保守和被动，难以充分适应这一领域的复杂监管需求。因此本文将以数字内容平台版权滥用问题为研究的逻辑起点，基于数字内容平台特殊性与规制难点，明确反垄断规制的必要性，并对数字内容平台版权滥用行为具体分析，结合当前数字经济下数字内容平台版权滥用的现状及困境，借鉴域外经验，寻求符合其行业特性的反垄断分析方法与长效监管思路，具体为：

首先，本文对数字内容平台概念进行界定，并分析该类平台不同于传统数字平台的中介特征、运营机制和生态系统等特殊性，从三个方面论述了反垄断的必要性。然后从不同角度分析了数字内容平台滥用版权行为，阐述了版权滥用行为的生成原理，论述了版权滥用的表现形式，包括数字内容平台与交易者达成垄断协议、数字内容平台滥用市场支配地位的行为、涉及版权交易的经营者集中等行为，表明版权滥用损害了市场竞争秩序和消费者利益。

其次，分析了我国数字内容平台版权滥用的立法现状和反垄断规制实践，以及通过上述研究得出我国数字内容平台版权滥用的困境有：版权保护与竞争关系失衡、版权滥用反垄断认定的规则存在不足和以事后救济为主的监管模式存在不足等问题。再次，分析了域外的相关规制经验，通过案例、法律法规来梳理欧盟、美国的实践，为我国数字版权滥用的反垄断规制寻找可用经验。

最后，通过三个方面展开数字内容平台版权滥用的反垄断规制路径，一是确立竞争损害作为反垄断介入标准和明晰独家版权协议的认定标准；二对优化相关市场的认定标准和明晰市场支配地位的认定；三是提出完善版权授权模式、关键设施版权的开放、扶持替代性公共设施和区块链的应用等事前干预干预措施。

With the rapid development of digital technology, digital content platforms have built up a strong barrier for the existing and potential competitors to enter the market by virtue of the competitive advantages generated by the network effect, user lock-in effect and copyright concentration effect. By establishing copyright barriers that are difficult for other platforms to overcome, the copyright abuse that breaks through the boundary of rights damages the competition in the digital copyright market, and then triggers the regulation of anti-monopoly law. When the current anti-monopoly law enforcement method in the field of digital content platform is relatively conservative and passive in facing the effectiveness of anti-monopoly problems in the field of digital content platform during and afterwards, and it is difficult to fully adapt to the complex regulatory needs in this field. So this paper will be digital content platform copyright abuse problem for the logical starting point, based on the digital content platform particularity and regulation difficulties, clear the necessity of antitrust regulation, and the digital content platform copyright abuse specific analysis, combined with the current digital content platform under the current situation of copyright abuse and dilemma, draw lessons from outside the experience, seek to accord with the industry characteristics of antitrust analysis method and long-term regulatory ideas, specific for:

First of all, this paper defines the concept of digital content platform, analyzes the intermediary characteristics, operation mechanism and ecosystem of such platforms, which are different from traditional digital platforms, and discusses the necessity of anti-monopoly from three aspects. Then analyzes the digital content platform copyright abuse, expounds the generation principle of copyright abuse, discusses the forms of copyright abuse, including digital content platform and traders monopoly agreement, digital content platform abuse of dominant market position, involving the concentration of copyright transactions, shows that copyright abuse damages the market competition order and consumer interests.

Secondly, the analysis of the digital content platform of copyright abuse legislation status and antitrust regulation practice, and through the research that the plight of digital content platform of copyright abuse in China are: copyright imbalance between copyright protection and competition, the lack of copyright abuse antitrust rules and afterwards relief shortage of regulatory mode. Thirdly, it analyzes the relevant regulatory experience outside the region, and sorts out the practice of the European Union and the United States through cases, laws and regulations, so as to find available experience for the anti-monopoly regulation of digital copyright abuse in China.

Finally, the anti-monopoly regulation path of copyright abuse of digital content platform is developed through three aspects: establishing the anti-monopoly intervention standard and clarifying the exclusive copyright agreement; identifying the standard of optimizing the relevant market and clarifying the market dominance; proposing prior intervention measures such as improving the copyright authorization mode, opening the copyright of key facilities, supporting alternative public facilities and the application of blockchain.