国际经济与贸易学院知识库

      当前数字经济的快速发展不仅改变着传统产业的经营方式与商业模式，而且 创造了许多新的商业机会与就业岗位，成为全球经济发展和学术界研究的热点问 题。近年来，东盟国家的数字经济也得到了快速发展，成为发展中国家发展数字 经济的新兴力量。东盟国家不仅与我国同属发展中国家，而且也是我国第一个 FTA 的成员伙伴与目前最大的贸易伙伴，因此其数字经济发展的正反经验不仅对 我国发展数字经济具有重要借鉴价值，而且也将对我国对外经济贸易关系的发展 产生重要影响。 

      论文以东盟国家数字经济的发展水平作为研究对象，在对相关文献进行综述 和东盟数字经济发展现状进行描述性分析的基础上，分别采用熵值法、TOPSIS 分析法对 2011-2020 年间东盟十国的数字经济发展水平进行计算测度及排名，采 用层次分析法对东盟十国的数字经济发展水平进行分类，采用极差、标准差、变 异系数、基尼系数等四个指标对东盟十国的数字经济发展水平进行时序差异演化 分析，并据此进一步探讨了东盟数字经济发展存在的主要问题。研究结果表明： 第一，东盟数字经济发展水平的各项指标呈逐步上升的趋势，但不同国家之间各 个维度发展水平各不相同；第二，东盟十国数字经济呈现集聚性发展，并可分为 发展水平依次递减的三个梯度，即以新加坡、马来西亚、菲律宾为代表的第一梯 度，以越南、印度尼西亚、泰国和文莱为代表的第二梯度，以及以老挝、缅甸、 柬埔寨为代表的第三梯度；第三，东盟数字经济发展水平的时序差异演化的绝对 差异和相对差异都在逐步缩小；第四，东盟十国的数字经济发展存在着发展不平 衡，部分国家的发展基础薄弱、创新环节不好和竞争力不强等问题。为此，论文 提出了加强合作、强化基础设施建设、优化研发环境等促进东盟国家数字经济更 好发展的对策建议；同时也指出，东盟国家数字经济发展中存在的问题在我国当 前数字经济发展中也较为普遍的存在，因此我国数字经济的发展规划与政策制定 应充分吸取东盟的经验教训。

      At present, the rapid development of digital economy not only changes the management mode and business model of traditional industries, but also creates many new business opportunities and jobs, which has become a hot issue in global economic development and academic research. In recent years, the digital economy of ASEAN countries has also been developing rapidly, becoming an emerging force in developing the digital economy of developing countries. ASEAN countries not only share a developing country with our country, but also are the first member partner and current largest trade partner of the FTA. Therefore, the positive and negative experiences of the development of digital economy will not only be of great reference value to the development of digital economy, but also will have an important influence on the development of foreign economic and trade relations. 

      This paper takes the development level of the digital economy of ASEAN countries as the research object. Based on the review of relevant literature and the descriptive analysis of the development status of the digital economy of ASEAN countries, entropy method and TOPSIS analysis method are adopted respectively to calculate, measure and rank the development level of the digital economy of ten ASEAN countries during 2011-2020. The digital economy development level of ten ASEAN countries is classified by analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the time series difference evolution analysis is carried out by four indexes including range, standard deviation, coefficient of variation and Gini coefficient. Based on this, the main problems existing in the development of ASEAN digital economy are further discussed. The results show that: first, the indicators of the development level of ASEAN digital economy show a gradual upward trend, but the development level of different dimensions is different among different countries; Secondly, the digital economy of ten ASEAN countries presents agglomeration development, which can be divided into three gradients of decreasing development level successively, namely, the first gradient represented by Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines, the second gradient represented by Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand and Brunei, and the third gradient represented by Laos, Myanmar and Cambodia. Thirdly, the absolute and relative differences of the temporal difference and evolution of the development level of ASEAN digital economy are gradually narrowing. Fourth, the development of digital economy in the ten ASEAN countries is not balanced. Some countries have weak development foundation, weak innovation links and weak competitiveness. To this end, the paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to promote the better development of digital economy in ASEAN countries, such as strengthening cooperation, strengthening infrastructure construction and optimizing research and development environment. At the same time, it is pointed out that the problems existing in the development of digital economy of ASEAN countries are also relatively common in our current development of digital economy. Therefore, the development planning and policy making of Chinese digital economy should fully absorb the experience and lessons of ASEAN.